Peer Review: It Should Be an Honorary Process
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer- Review Process
Peer review of manuscripts for biomedical journals has become a subject of intense ethical debate. One of the most contentious issues is whether or not peer review should be anonymous. This study aimed to generate a rich, empirically-grounded understanding of the values held by journal editors and peer reviewers with a view to informing journal policy. Qualitative methods were used to carry out...
متن کاملMRS Shimming: An Important Point Which Should not be Ignored
Introduction: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a well-known device for analyzing the biological fluids metabolically. Obtaining accurate and reliable information via MRS needs a homogeneous magnetic field in order to provide well-defined peaks and uniform water suppression. There are lots of reasons which can disturb the magnetic field homogeneity which can be corrected by a proc...
متن کاملPeer to Peer Edge Caches Should be Free
Bulk-data peer to peer systems have been promoted as reducing the cost of content distribution. Unfortunately, this isn’t generally true. Rather, bulk-data P2P shifts the costs of delivery from the content provider to the ISPs or content recipients. A very simple economic model of content delivery shows how this occurs and that, under some conditions, P2P can grossly magnify costs. Even with lo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Surgery
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0003-4932,1528-1140
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003952